Mistress Ree

Monokuro, Your are entirely correct. In my second post i think i mentioned that a "monogamous" relationship with subs is not actually monogamous at all on the Mistresses side, which is a little ironic when using the term "monogamy". By definition, such a relationship is not monogamous at all and i like that you touch on the difference in Mistress/sub relations between professional dommes and lifestyle ones. With a lifestyle or non-professional domme there is the possibility of achieving close to what you term a "true" monogamous relationship- with professional dommes as i mentioned above, it is impossible to achieve the textbook definition of such. While i agree that using the term "monogamous" to describe a long term relationship with a loyal sub is not accurate by definition nor can the term properly encompass the complexity of a Mistress/sub relationship, i feel that it is easier to use and the image it evokes is closest to what is meant. However, maybe we should come up with a better term? "Long term relationship with a loyal sub"?

If there are things you know you absolutely don't want (hard limits) which you didn't mention when booking a session, then just tell your Mistress at the beginning of the session. Safe words are also used, so if you find you dislike or cannot stand something during the session you can let your Mistress know.

Mister Winerack, Oh wow. I didn't realize my response would open up such a stream! I suppose a "monogamous" relationship with a sub would be after several visits and he has expressed very deep attachment to the point of excluding other Mistresses. A sub with that mindset towards his Mistress would most likely feel a certain amount of guilt sessioning with another, but he is the one that has caused it so. Even if i were to feel "cheated on" i would never guilt trip a sub over having seen someone else. However, i must make it clear that i am speaking about this theoretically. I have yet to be in a "monogamous" relationship with a sub, but this is how i believe i would respond in such a situation. (Of course, this "monogamous" relationship with subs is not actually monogamous at all, on the Mistresses side.). I also think that Ahn's comparison of Mistresses with fine wines is a very good example, because Mistresses are all different in personality and style. Like any other type of human relationship there are infinite shades of gray in thought and feeling. It is impossible and ridiculous to say there are rules and standards because everyone is different and interacts differently with different people. And as far as i am aware there no jealousies concerning subs at the Fortress.

Mister Winerack (haha at first i thought it was Winecrack, lol), I see relationships with subs as any other intimate relationship. There's long term, short term, open and "one session stands" so to speak. However in my mind to see a particular sub "monogamously" would color our relationship with a much greater degree of intimacy. In that regard, to have him see another Mistress would indeed feel like cheating to me. Even more so if it were kept hidden. If it were mentioned and explained to me (i.e. curiosity about another Mistress' style, etc) humbly however, i'm sure i would understand. There would still be some punishment, as a matter of course, but nothing so hellish. Now if a sub who was monogamous to me tasted the "forbidden fruits" and then began seeing "the Other Mistress" as often as myself, i admit i would feel a little disgruntlement at having to share. But if said sub left me completely for the Other Mistress it would be like any other intimate relationship in which one was dumped for another, and i would feel varying measures of rage, jealousy and sadness. Of course, it would be different with a sub with whom i was not in a "monogamous" relationship with. I would not feel possessive of a sub if i knew we had an "open" relationship.

Hmph! Maybe i will. Or not.

Spockme, I'll have you know i had been very eagerly looking forward to seeing you and was SEVERELY disappointed when you ran off. Your "gift" was nice, but not nearly as nice as it would have been for me had you stayed. I almost suspect you of purposefully trying to sabotage the relationship-which-could-be between us. Mistress Ree, If you need a posse to track him down and bring him back I'm sure you'll have no problem recruiting volunteers. Ray I'm sure i won't

Spockme, I'll have you know i had been very eagerly looking forward to seeing you and was SEVERELY disappointed when you ran off. Your "gift" was nice, but not nearly as nice as it would have been for me had you stayed. I almost suspect you of purposefully trying to sabotage the relationship-which-could-be between us.

Sammy, Personally i prefer the Steel and Pink rooms, because they have more equipment in them. The Tatami room is nice but rather stark in comparison. It is also a smaller space.

Akiravn- A transformer? What an unusual idea. I've always wanted to be able to shape-shift, although i don't quite think you mean animals. Still.... i could be a bear with a Ree-face. Or a Ree-faced porcupine! How would you feel about sessioning with a stunningly beautiful Ree-noceros?

Aw man :roll: hehe

Hi! Come.

Haahahahahahahaha!

...Anyway, my being a Russian nesting doll comes from a great tale involving a clone...

A RAGGEDY ANN DOLL? WITH GARISH RED CHEEKS, ARE YOU SERIOUS??! :x :evil:

...I am now imagining my feet like that. Would it feel ticklish? If i became excited (while barefoot) would i leave little squishes with every step?

I was a little disappointed but still had a good time. It felt like a party with so many of us there, and he was our entertainment! It would have felt very upscale had we glasses of wine and candlelight. I think the fact that he had recently gotten over being sick and other factors contributed to his lack of enthusiasm. He was clearly disappointed himself, and a little embarrassed. Maybe he was apprehensive about 5 Mistresses at once, despite the fact that it was a fantasy of his, and couldn't relax enough to really get into the session? I would love the chance to try a session with 4 other Mistresses again.

LOL! No way, the piggy hat is cute!!

You're very welcome! I had a wonderful time, myself. And your username is great, hehehe!

Dear Mistress Ree, Looking at your beautiful pictures and reading your many interesting posts always seems to give me a certain form of gratification. Enjoy turkey day with your momma this year! Thank you, i will

I like her response, "...for function and gratification." It sounds so perfectly prim! However, i don't own a turkey baster. My momma is making the turkey this year

Spockme, Indeed, i look forward to seeing you! A ballbusting party sounds like fun, but for our first session together i want you all to myself. :twisted:

Spockme, That sounds like fun!

Regarding Lady Heather, there is one episode where Catherine goes to her house to ask her about something. She knocks on the door and is surprised when Grissom answers. It is implied that he spent the night, but i don't think anything beyond that is revealed regarding what type of physical relationship they may or may not have and how far it may or may not have gone.

I don't remember what time i left, but it certainly wasn't early!